Comparison
Stoner Singles vs High There!
High There! built its profile around photo and video stories, more of a feed-and-discovery feel. We're a dating-first product with community on top. Different bets, different fits.
The short version
High There! leans into the social-discovery feel: stories, video, scrolling through cannabis-friendly people doing cannabis-friendly things. Stoner Singles is more conventional dating-app shape, with filters, messaging, and structured matching as the spine.
Side-by-side
| Stoner Singles | High There! | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary product shape | Dating app with profiles, filters, messaging | Social-discovery with photo and video stories |
| Free tier | Full profile, browse, limited messaging | Comparable |
| UK and US availability | Both, day-one | Both |
| Wider English markets | AU, IE, CA, NZ all active | Variable presence |
| Match flow | Daily suggestions plus search with filters | Discovery feed |
| Content emphasis | Editorial blog and community | User-generated photo and video |
| Audience age skew | 35-54 core | Younger lean, broadly |
| Best fit for | Adults who want filters and conversations to matter | People who want to scroll and discover by vibe |
Where High There! is good
If you respond to a Stories-style feed and want to see cannabis culture as part of how you discover people, that's a real and legitimate product experience. The visual feed gives you a sense of who someone is faster than text bios do, and the user-generated content side keeps the app feeling alive.
For users who'd find Stoner Singles a bit conventional, High There! is a meaningful alternative shape of the same idea.
Where Stoner Singles is different
We're built around the conversation and the match, not the feed. Daily match suggestions, advanced filters (city, distance, experience level, consumption style), messaging that doesn't gate the basic exchange. The structured side is where we put the work in.
Our audience also skews older. The core paid-user band sits 35 to 54. If you'd prefer to date among adults who've been around cannabis long enough to be unremarkable about it, the demographic shape of who you'll see on Stoner Singles fits that.
And the editorial layer. The blog isn't a marketing afterthought, it's commissioned writing from real journalists with publication credits. If you want a dating brand that thinks about cannabis dating seriously, that's the signal.
Who we'd send to High There! instead
If you genuinely prefer the Stories format to a profile-and-filters format. If you're early 20s to early 30s and the median user on Stoner Singles would feel slightly older than you want. If you find dating apps tedious and want something that feels closer to a social feed.
Who we'd suggest Stoner Singles for
If you're past the swipe-and-see era and want filters that actually narrow things down. If you live outside the US, where we have built local user bases rather than treating you as overflow. If you want a conversation about cannabis without it being the conversation.
The bottom line
Two different design philosophies on the same underlying problem. Try the one whose product shape sounds right. The free tiers exist for that. If High There! turns out to be too much feed and not enough match, we're here.
Try Stoner Singles
Free to sign up. Browse the actual people you can match with. Upgrade only if you want more.